The total working‐hour losses have translated into a sharp drop in labour income and an increase in poverty. Global labour income, which does not include government transfers and benefits, was US$3.7 trillion (8.3% lower in 2020 than it would have been in the absence of the pandemic). Relative to 2019, an estimated additional 108 million workers are now extremely or moderately poor, meaning that they and their family members are having to live on less than US$3.20 per day in purchasing power parity terms. Five years of progress towards eradicating working poverty have been undone, as operating poverty rates have reverted to 2015.
Recovery is possible- but can it set things right?
“The recovery will be relatively faster in high‐income countries. In low‐ and middle‐income countries, the more limited access to vaccines and greater constraints on fiscal spending will dampen the employment recovery.”
A globally uneven economic recovery process can be expected to begin from the second half of 2021 onwards, driven by progress in vaccination and large-scale fiscal spending. But the projected employment growth will be too weak to provide sufficient employment opportunities for those who became inactive or unemployed during the pandemic and for younger cohorts entering the labour market, who have suffered significant disruptions to their education and training.
Globally, the recovery is projected to result in the net creation of 100 million jobs in 2021 and an additional 80 million jobs in 2022. Projected employment in 2021, however, will still fall short of its pre‐crisis level. In addition, there will likely be fewer jobs than would have been created in the absence of the pandemic. Taking this forgone employment growth into account, the crisis‐induced global shortfall in jobs is projected to stand at 75 million in 2021 and 23 million in 2022
“Are Unemployment and Poverty the only issues of the labour force?”
Apart from the Financial crisis, a plethora of already existing work deficits and social issues have come up in the light of this ordeal.
4. The ability to work from home in higher‐skilled occupations and areas with readier access to the internet has accentuated inequalities between the global North and the global South, between households with different socio-economic status, and between rural and urban areas. Also, the shift to working from home can potentially weaken social cohesion, as workplaces have traditionally played an essential role as venues for human interaction.
5. The crisis threatens to jeopardise progress on gender equality, as women have suffered disproportionate job losses while seeing their unpaid working time increase. The disruption to labour markets has had devastating consequences for both men and women, yet women’s employment declined by 5% in 2020 compared with 3.9% for men.
6. The crisis has affected many young people at a critical moment in their lives, disrupting their transition from school or university to work. Evidence from previous problems shows that entering the labour market during a recession reduces longer‐term employment probabilities, wages and the prospects for on‐the‐job skills development.
7. The COVID-19 crisis has further highlighted the vulnerable situation of migrant workers. Many migrant workers experienced an abrupt termination of their employment along with non‐payment or delayed payment of wages, and at the same time often lacked access to social protection benefits that could make up for their income losses.
“The Silver Lining….”
It also stresses strengthening the institutional foundations of inclusive, sustainable and resilient economic growth and development by enhancing social protection systems, promoting formalisation, and ensuring that all workers, irrespective of their contractual arrangements, have the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining, enjoy safe and healthy working conditions and receive adequate minimum wages.






